Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:01): Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:01):nix run .#package-name should work, no?
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:02):Ah, different executables. Try nix --accept-flake-config run github:juspay/omnix show <your-flake>. You should see the executables in the apps section.
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:02):Do you have to add any reference of the other executables in the flake file?
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:02):I will try that out shortly!
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:06):If you try it out in the haskell-flake example, you can expect the two executables to show up:
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:06):That command indeed shows up the correct list of executables for the project
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:07):But I'm not too sure nix build .#exec-2 works as intended.
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:07):You have to nix run it:
❯ nix run .#ex2
warning: Git tree '/Users/srid/code/haskell-flake' is dirty
Hello, Haskell!
nix build is used for packages not apps
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:08):As you can see from the output of om show in that screenshot above. See the table header.
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:09):I see my mistake. Does that mean that the flake does not need to reference any executable?
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:09):haskell-flake auto-generates them for you
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:09):apps.ex2 just wraps packages.example
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:10):I see, I see
Srid (Apr 06 2025 at 07:10):If you are curious of implementation.
${lib.getBin package}/bin/${exe}
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:14):I think we can put this to solved. My original problem seems to have been addressed and now I just can't run the executables because of different reasons (one of the packages is not passing checkPhase)
Lemos (Apr 06 2025 at 07:16):Thank you very much, both for haskell-flake and helping me with these questions!
Last updated: Apr 26 2025 at 14:15 UTC